Some unexpected developments.
The life I am in the process of building has shattered yet again.
The pieces are scattered.
Not thinking.
Not processing.
Not yet.
Tomorrow.
Until then, my dreams are laid away.
Let's just be a little wild, just for tonight.
No time to think of consequences.
Push forward.
Find hope.
Smile.
It could be worse....
Friday, January 27, 2012
On Mr. Beast in the Morning
I'm way too busy at work right now to even think about posting something legitimate. But I've been having some serious thoughts, so be excited.
Anyway, for your viewing pleasure, my son Carlos.
Dear lord, I love him. February 10th will mark our two-year adoption anniversary!
Anyway, for your viewing pleasure, my son Carlos.
Dear lord, I love him. February 10th will mark our two-year adoption anniversary!
Thursday, January 26, 2012
On Skinny
Perhaps you've noticed that I'm looking sort of bony these days.
I'm usually a pretty slender person. Solid, but slender.
I started dropping weight and didn't even notice. Of course, there were signs: The funeral back in December. My black dress that normally looks stunning on me just hung there, a sad sack of cloth on a frame. The fact that my pants weren't fitting - I thought it was just cheap detergent. It really hit me when I went to buy new pants. I grabbed my usual size and put them on. Nope, no way. The pants were hanging off me. Grabbed a smaller size. Put those on. Nope. So here I am, ten pounds lighter than my normal, wearing tiny pants that are way smaller than anything I've ever worn and rocking a fiercely sharp clavicle, while mourning the loss of my South Africa boobs. (I ate so much custard to grow them!)
Now before you cry "eating disorder!", let me explain.
I'm still within what the CDC considers a healthy weight range. [That is totally stretching the truth. My body mass index (BMI) is hovering at around 18.5, the very bottom edge of "healthy." But it still counts!] I went in last week and my doctor told me not to lose any more weight. (As I type this, there is a quarter pounder in my hand. Gross, but effective.)
So why all of this weight loss?
In September, I had my yearly performance review at work. My only negative was "focus," but in our meeting, my boss jokingly told me that he was sure that the only thing that would ever fix that was medication. But a larger raise was out of the question based on the lack of focus affecting my work. This really hit home for me, obviously. (My boss in high school used to tell me that I had the attention span of a golden retriever, so this "focus" issue is not a new thing.)
I decided to talk to my doctor about it. It was an oddly confrontational meeting. I underwent two horrible days of testing with a psychologist who looks exactly like Tobias Funke from Arrested Development. When I see him, it's seriously very hard for me not to throw out Tobias quotes.
The testing was lame, but the psychologist is hilarious and amazing. As it turns out, I have zero learning disabilities (they include that in testing to rule everything out), am at or slightly above average at math (this is the scariest part of that - if I'm average, how bad can it get?), have insanely awesome phonemic awareness, and am a classic case of combined-type ADHD.
The ADHD diagnosis did not come as a shock, although I'm now wondering how I ever managed to get anything accomplished before.
So we began the time-honored tradition of messing around with medication. Let me tell you a few things: Ritalin is the scariest thing ever. Probably worse than meth. Actually, no. I just did a quick search for meth billboards and they're very clear that meth is so much scarier than Ritalin. Sort of. Anyway, I took it for like three weeks, I think. Horrid. My resting heart rate was 120 beats per minute. I was super cracked out and jumpy. All very attractive qualities, I assure you.
So we switched. I'm very happy with my new meds, but I am learning that I seriously hate dealing with UnitedHealthcare more than anything. They're a bunch of dicks who sit in a room laughing about the problems of the people who pay them insane amounts of money only to have nothing covered. They've denied my coverage for my meds because I'm over 18, because they don't want me to get generic, and so on down their list of excuses. So I'm paying out of pocket. And silently cursing them while I wait to re-file my claim.
The side effects of the new meds are relatively few, except for the pesky eating problem. It hurts me to eat. I have little to no interest in food. So I've been trying to creative about getting calories. I'm working on it. I spoke to a friend who was also late-in-life (ha) diagnosed with ADHD and she said that after a little while, it'll be easier. It's starting to be a little bit better. Last night, I was starving. All I wanted was Indian food. So I went and got some and it was perfect. (The leftovers are languishing in the backseat of my car. Gross. I should probably do something about that.)
The benefits far outweigh the negatives. I am so much more productive and focused at work. It feels good. I'm working harder and accomplishing tasks. Also, I'm making lists. Legitimate, color-coded, categorized lists. It's crazy and awesome. I keep a calender now. I'm still disorganized as all hell, but we're working on that. Baby steps
I'm usually a pretty slender person. Solid, but slender.
I started dropping weight and didn't even notice. Of course, there were signs: The funeral back in December. My black dress that normally looks stunning on me just hung there, a sad sack of cloth on a frame. The fact that my pants weren't fitting - I thought it was just cheap detergent. It really hit me when I went to buy new pants. I grabbed my usual size and put them on. Nope, no way. The pants were hanging off me. Grabbed a smaller size. Put those on. Nope. So here I am, ten pounds lighter than my normal, wearing tiny pants that are way smaller than anything I've ever worn and rocking a fiercely sharp clavicle, while mourning the loss of my South Africa boobs. (I ate so much custard to grow them!)
Now before you cry "eating disorder!", let me explain.
I'm still within what the CDC considers a healthy weight range. [That is totally stretching the truth. My body mass index (BMI) is hovering at around 18.5, the very bottom edge of "healthy." But it still counts!] I went in last week and my doctor told me not to lose any more weight. (As I type this, there is a quarter pounder in my hand. Gross, but effective.)
So why all of this weight loss?
In September, I had my yearly performance review at work. My only negative was "focus," but in our meeting, my boss jokingly told me that he was sure that the only thing that would ever fix that was medication. But a larger raise was out of the question based on the lack of focus affecting my work. This really hit home for me, obviously. (My boss in high school used to tell me that I had the attention span of a golden retriever, so this "focus" issue is not a new thing.)
I decided to talk to my doctor about it. It was an oddly confrontational meeting. I underwent two horrible days of testing with a psychologist who looks exactly like Tobias Funke from Arrested Development. When I see him, it's seriously very hard for me not to throw out Tobias quotes.
The testing was lame, but the psychologist is hilarious and amazing. As it turns out, I have zero learning disabilities (they include that in testing to rule everything out), am at or slightly above average at math (this is the scariest part of that - if I'm average, how bad can it get?), have insanely awesome phonemic awareness, and am a classic case of combined-type ADHD.
The ADHD diagnosis did not come as a shock, although I'm now wondering how I ever managed to get anything accomplished before.
So we began the time-honored tradition of messing around with medication. Let me tell you a few things: Ritalin is the scariest thing ever. Probably worse than meth. Actually, no. I just did a quick search for meth billboards and they're very clear that meth is so much scarier than Ritalin. Sort of. Anyway, I took it for like three weeks, I think. Horrid. My resting heart rate was 120 beats per minute. I was super cracked out and jumpy. All very attractive qualities, I assure you.
So we switched. I'm very happy with my new meds, but I am learning that I seriously hate dealing with UnitedHealthcare more than anything. They're a bunch of dicks who sit in a room laughing about the problems of the people who pay them insane amounts of money only to have nothing covered. They've denied my coverage for my meds because I'm over 18, because they don't want me to get generic, and so on down their list of excuses. So I'm paying out of pocket. And silently cursing them while I wait to re-file my claim.
The side effects of the new meds are relatively few, except for the pesky eating problem. It hurts me to eat. I have little to no interest in food. So I've been trying to creative about getting calories. I'm working on it. I spoke to a friend who was also late-in-life (ha) diagnosed with ADHD and she said that after a little while, it'll be easier. It's starting to be a little bit better. Last night, I was starving. All I wanted was Indian food. So I went and got some and it was perfect. (The leftovers are languishing in the backseat of my car. Gross. I should probably do something about that.)
The benefits far outweigh the negatives. I am so much more productive and focused at work. It feels good. I'm working harder and accomplishing tasks. Also, I'm making lists. Legitimate, color-coded, categorized lists. It's crazy and awesome. I keep a calender now. I'm still disorganized as all hell, but we're working on that. Baby steps
![]() |
| Source for this image linked here |
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
On Tuesday
There are those moments when everything is sailing along and then all of sudden, it's like the entire world begins to crumble, just enough to knock you off balance but not enough to really count as a legitimate disaster.
That's where we're at right now.
Work is the busiest that it's ever been. I've got pressing projects and deadlines looming over my shoulders, and simply not enough time to get anything and everything done.
Life is the same. I'm struggling to find the contentment that settled over everything at the beginning of the year. I want to re-engage it and channel my nervous energy into something productive, but I'm currently unable to get a handle on anything. And so I'm panicky, anxious, stressed, and edgy. I'm quite a joy to be around these days.
I'm hoping that a good dose of trivia tonight and some serious Jacob time tomorrow evening will produce a semblance of calm that will propel me through the week.
That's where we're at right now.
Work is the busiest that it's ever been. I've got pressing projects and deadlines looming over my shoulders, and simply not enough time to get anything and everything done.
Life is the same. I'm struggling to find the contentment that settled over everything at the beginning of the year. I want to re-engage it and channel my nervous energy into something productive, but I'm currently unable to get a handle on anything. And so I'm panicky, anxious, stressed, and edgy. I'm quite a joy to be around these days.
I'm hoping that a good dose of trivia tonight and some serious Jacob time tomorrow evening will produce a semblance of calm that will propel me through the week.
Monday, January 23, 2012
On Math.
I'm admittedly not the biggest fan of the Huffington Post, but you know, they're not all bad. Anyway, saw this article this morning.
I've been bad at math since about fourth grade. "Bad" is relative: on recent intelligence tests (I'll explain in a blog post soon), even my weaknesses measure at or above average. So "bad" at math isn't really that bad. But I'm still not great. However, finding out that I might be genetically inclined not to understand fractals and long division makes the grieving process (for my future as a geneticist or forensic scientist) much easier. Okay, so there's not really any proof of the gender gap, but I'm going to run with it: Damn you, double-X chromosomes and breasts! (Hah, mark this as the first time they've actually gotten in my way.)


I've been bad at math since about fourth grade. "Bad" is relative: on recent intelligence tests (I'll explain in a blog post soon), even my weaknesses measure at or above average. So "bad" at math isn't really that bad. But I'm still not great. However, finding out that I might be genetically inclined not to understand fractals and long division makes the grieving process (for my future as a geneticist or forensic scientist) much easier. Okay, so there's not really any proof of the gender gap, but I'm going to run with it: Damn you, double-X chromosomes and breasts! (Hah, mark this as the first time they've actually gotten in my way.)
Math Gender Gap Not Result of Girls' Low Self-Esteem, Researchers Say
First Posted: 1/19/12 09:47 AM ET Updated: 1/19/12 09:48 AM ET
React
Follow
Education , Gender Gap , Boys Better Than Girls At Math , Gender Gap Math , Girls Bad At Math , Girls Boys Math , Girls Math , Women Bad At Math , Science New
Are girls bad at math? From a talking Barbie doll saying "Math class is tough" to Larry Summers, the ex-President of Harvard University, speaking on the "different availability of aptitude," it's an issue that's seen plenty of controversy. As one of the most sensitive topics in education today, there's plenty of research on it, and even a body of research on the research.
A study to be published in Review of General Psychology, falls into the latter category. Its authors, David Geary of the University of Missouri and Giljsbert Stoet of the University of Leeds, find that if a gender gap in math test scores exists, it isn't a manifestation of the so-called "stereotype threat" theory, as many researchers seem to believe.
According to that theory, girls tend to perform worse on tests after they've been told they'll do poorly. Geary and Stoet found that past studies relying on the theory were flawed and lacking real evidence. This suggests that if girls are scoring worse than boys on standardized math tests, it's not because of their low self esteem.
According to that theory, girls tend to perform worse on tests after they've been told they'll do poorly. Geary and Stoet found that past studies relying on the theory were flawed and lacking real evidence. This suggests that if girls are scoring worse than boys on standardized math tests, it's not because of their low self esteem.
In other words, don't blame ditzy Barbie.
The new finding suggests that it might make sense to scale back social programs designed to counter the stereotype threat. As Geary noted:
“The stereotype theory really was adopted by psychologists and policy makers around the world as the final word, with the idea that eliminating the stereotype could eliminate the gender gap...However, even with many programs established to address the issue, the problem continued. We now believe the wrong problem is being addressed.”
Geary and Stoat make no contention about the gender gap itself. Their study makes a strong case for ruling out a self esteem-based explanation of the gender gap, but an increasing number of scientists believe the gender gap is illusory in the first place.
Recent years have brought mounting evidence against the idea that, other things being equal, women are worse at math than men. A 2011 study published in Psychological Bulletin found evidence of gender gaps in various countries, but noted that in some countries, such as Jordan and Bahrain, girls had the edge.
Friday, January 20, 2012
On Obama's Awesomeness for Today
Yay! I love this:
Great news! Despite months of fierce lobbying by the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Obama administration announced today that it would not exempt Catholic hospitals from the Affordable Care Act requirement for insurance plans to cover employees’ birth control. The news, which comes on the first day of Trust Women Week, is a welcome victory for feminists.
Victory! Obama Stands Up to Bishops and Protects Birth Control Coverage
Back in November, feminists were concerned that President Obama might cave in to the Bishops’ pressure to exempt religious institutions. If the Bishops had their way, it would have meant that organizations that aren’t actual churches–such as colleges, universities and hospitals–would get out of covering birth control in insurance plans for their students and employees, despite an HHS ruling last August that birth control constitutes preventive care and should be covered with no copay. Feminists–including Feminist Majority President (and Ms. publisher) Eleanor Smeal–have loudly urged the administration not to let Catholic Bishops deny no-cost birth control coverage to millions. Here is Smeal’s response to today’s announcement:
At last—concern for women’s health trumps pressure from the Catholic Bishops. Millions of women who may have been denied access to birth control with no co-pays or deductibles will now have full access. I am especially pleased that college students at religiously affiliated institutions will now have coverage for birth control without co-pays or deductibles under their school health plans beginning in August 2012.Birth control is the number one prescription drug for women ages 18 to 44 years. Right now, the average woman has to pay $50 per month for 30 years for birth control. No wonder many low-income women have had to forgo regular use of birth control and half of US pregnancies are unplanned. This decision will help millions of women and their families.
Some religious institutions will be given a one-year extension–from August 2012 to August 2013–to implement the no-fee coverage. Here are the details of the ruling:
- Insurance plans that already cover birth control, including those of religious institutions, must do so with no co-pays or deductibles starting August 2012
- All student insurance plans at religiously affiliated universities must cover contraception with no co-pays or deductibles beginning August 2012
- Non-profit religious institutions that do not currently cover contraception have until August 2013 to do so with no co-pays or deductibles
- Only women who work directly for a house of worship, such as for a church, synagogue, or mosque itself, are exempted from this required coverage
Photo of President Obama from Flickr user lednichenkoolga under Creative Commons 2.0
source: Ms. Magazine Blog
Thursday, January 19, 2012
On Mullen and the Black Spot
I've been working on my opinion of this whole Mullen mess for a while now. I've been hesitant to post something condemning the administration, but I guess the time for the higher path of reason has passed. Last night, in a meeting at Mullen, the administrators alleged that recruiting violations occurred at Mullen during Logan's tenure as coach and asserted that those alleged violations were the reason they fired him. In reading that, I made up my mind.
Why would you wait until last night night to make as-yet-unsubstantiated allegations public after releasing statements a week prior that gave no indication of foul play but instead focused on the need for a full-time coach?
I'm sorry, but that looks pathetic. It looks like a weak attempt to divert some of the attention away from the people who are calling for the resignation of the administrators and the board. It looks like the worst possible PR move to have made. They're running scared and they're desperate to find a way out.
There have been whispers of recruiting violations at Mullen for years. YEARS. I started there in the fall of 2003, and even then, there was talk of our heavy recruiting. And yet, I don't believe for a single second that these alleged violations were solely practiced by Logan and that the administrators and board were blind. I think that the whispers of Clement wanting the QB coaching job carry more weight than he wants to admit.
Honestly, I don't care if there were recruiting violations. I will wait for proof. I will wait to see what CHSAA has to say about it. As far as I know, most schools do it. Both Regis and Valor have been found to have committed minor infractions.
This goes so much deeper than just Dave Logan. In speaking to some of my friends from high school about it, they say that they stopped caring about Mullen after one of our English teachers was fired for saying the N-word (in was in the context of a story they were reading in class). That teacher never should have been fired; he was a brilliant educator. He approached as us though we were adults (which, when you're 14 and desperate to be seen as an adult - or at the very least, a young adult, is a wonderful thing) and enabled us to view the material through a more focused lens. It was the foundation for critical thinking. It was about expanding your boundaries and coming face-to-face with material that you might not have otherwise examined. While I have no idea what happened to the kid involved with that, I will posit that he was immature and unable to separate the fictive world of literature with the realities of our modern society.
Since I left Mullen in 2006 - with 9 college credits stemming from my time in Advanced Placement classes, no less, I have heard very little good news. I'd be hard-pressed to find a good piece of press about them that's not football-related (and now, just a good piece of press in general). I'm saddened to see that attempts to bring the school back to its former glory have all but destroyed its reputation in the Denver community. I'm disgusted to hear about some of the changes that have gone on. For further proof, look to the teachers. Mullen has lost more good teachers than it can replace.
The petition that I mentioned earlier this week now has nearly 1300 signatures. I signed, not just because I think that firing Dave Logan was an epic show of idiocy but because I think that Mullen is not the place that it once was. I learned to read good and do other stuff good too, but I also learned a hell of a lot more. I learned about faith - I am not a practicing Catholic due to criticisms relating to the hypocrisy of the Pope and the church structure, but I believe that my time at Mullen taught me how to live a life full of the truest values of any religion: respect, tolerance, kindness, giving, knowledge. Social justice as a principle is something that has been a constant throughout my education and I value that immensely.
These people, both the administration and the board, are preaching Christian values but are acting exactly the opposite. It's a shame to see Christ so misrepresented. I hate to see that lying, deceit, and a complete lack of transparency can be offered up as examples of pure LaSallian values. I'm disappointed, but more than that, I'm embarrassed.
By the way, if and when Logan takes the open coaching job at Creek, they're going to crush our team. And it's sad to see the football players and other students used as pawns in some power grab. They lost more than a coach - a few probably lost their futures. Way to go, Gmelich and Clement. Way to take a good thing and shit all over it. This is not something that will blow over any time soon. You're looking at a black spot.
Edited at 12:04pm: Speaking to someone who was at the meeting, I am becoming more and more nervous about my own graduate school application. My source tells me that a girl going through the interview process at Duke spent most of her interview defending her decision to go to Mullen. Great news for me, especially since I'm applying to a local school. I certainly hope that I don't have to spend my interview wishing I'd gone to Thomas Jefferson or George Washington instead. (That was something I never thought I'd say.)
The Denver Post
Read more:Mullen High reveals recruiting violations in football program - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/preps/ci_19771784#ixzz1jvIXqkP0
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Source: The Denver Post online (article linked here)
Why would you wait until last night night to make as-yet-unsubstantiated allegations public after releasing statements a week prior that gave no indication of foul play but instead focused on the need for a full-time coach?
I'm sorry, but that looks pathetic. It looks like a weak attempt to divert some of the attention away from the people who are calling for the resignation of the administrators and the board. It looks like the worst possible PR move to have made. They're running scared and they're desperate to find a way out.
There have been whispers of recruiting violations at Mullen for years. YEARS. I started there in the fall of 2003, and even then, there was talk of our heavy recruiting. And yet, I don't believe for a single second that these alleged violations were solely practiced by Logan and that the administrators and board were blind. I think that the whispers of Clement wanting the QB coaching job carry more weight than he wants to admit.
Honestly, I don't care if there were recruiting violations. I will wait for proof. I will wait to see what CHSAA has to say about it. As far as I know, most schools do it. Both Regis and Valor have been found to have committed minor infractions.
This goes so much deeper than just Dave Logan. In speaking to some of my friends from high school about it, they say that they stopped caring about Mullen after one of our English teachers was fired for saying the N-word (in was in the context of a story they were reading in class). That teacher never should have been fired; he was a brilliant educator. He approached as us though we were adults (which, when you're 14 and desperate to be seen as an adult - or at the very least, a young adult, is a wonderful thing) and enabled us to view the material through a more focused lens. It was the foundation for critical thinking. It was about expanding your boundaries and coming face-to-face with material that you might not have otherwise examined. While I have no idea what happened to the kid involved with that, I will posit that he was immature and unable to separate the fictive world of literature with the realities of our modern society.
Since I left Mullen in 2006 - with 9 college credits stemming from my time in Advanced Placement classes, no less, I have heard very little good news. I'd be hard-pressed to find a good piece of press about them that's not football-related (and now, just a good piece of press in general). I'm saddened to see that attempts to bring the school back to its former glory have all but destroyed its reputation in the Denver community. I'm disgusted to hear about some of the changes that have gone on. For further proof, look to the teachers. Mullen has lost more good teachers than it can replace.
The petition that I mentioned earlier this week now has nearly 1300 signatures. I signed, not just because I think that firing Dave Logan was an epic show of idiocy but because I think that Mullen is not the place that it once was. I learned to read good and do other stuff good too, but I also learned a hell of a lot more. I learned about faith - I am not a practicing Catholic due to criticisms relating to the hypocrisy of the Pope and the church structure, but I believe that my time at Mullen taught me how to live a life full of the truest values of any religion: respect, tolerance, kindness, giving, knowledge. Social justice as a principle is something that has been a constant throughout my education and I value that immensely.
These people, both the administration and the board, are preaching Christian values but are acting exactly the opposite. It's a shame to see Christ so misrepresented. I hate to see that lying, deceit, and a complete lack of transparency can be offered up as examples of pure LaSallian values. I'm disappointed, but more than that, I'm embarrassed.
By the way, if and when Logan takes the open coaching job at Creek, they're going to crush our team. And it's sad to see the football players and other students used as pawns in some power grab. They lost more than a coach - a few probably lost their futures. Way to go, Gmelich and Clement. Way to take a good thing and shit all over it. This is not something that will blow over any time soon. You're looking at a black spot.
Edited at 12:04pm: Speaking to someone who was at the meeting, I am becoming more and more nervous about my own graduate school application. My source tells me that a girl going through the interview process at Duke spent most of her interview defending her decision to go to Mullen. Great news for me, especially since I'm applying to a local school. I certainly hope that I don't have to spend my interview wishing I'd gone to Thomas Jefferson or George Washington instead. (That was something I never thought I'd say.)
POST PREPS
Mullen High reveals recruiting violations in football program
POSTED: 01/19/2012 01:00:00 AM MST
UPDATED: 01/19/2012 08:17:22 AM MST
By Eric Gorski and Neil H. DevlinUPDATED: 01/19/2012 08:17:22 AM MST
The Denver Post
RELATED
- Mike Brookhart bows out as Cherry Creek's football coach
- Mullen says Dave Logan's staff committed football recruiting violations
- Dave Logan's celebrity, disagreement on assistants reasons for his firing at Mullen
- Dave Logan continues to "focus on the positive" on radio show
- Students wage brief protest after Mullen ousts football coach Dave Logan
- Mullen High dismisses Dave Logan as football coach
- Dave Logan out as Mullen High football coach
In a tense meeting Wednesday night, the chief executive of Mullen High School announced the school had notified the Colorado High School Activities Association of recruiting violations committed by the staff of former football coach Dave Logan, who was fired last week.
"This is a Mullen failure, top to bottom," Ryan Clement, the Catholic school's president and CEO, told a packed room on campus. "And we need to fix it. ... We are Mullen. The standard is different."
Mullen stunned the Colorado sports community by firing Logan after a nine-year tenure during which he won four state championships. Not until Wednesday did school officials mention recruiting violations.
Logan said Wednesday night that in his 19 years of
coaching football, he has never been sanctioned.
"I would just say that I find the timing of this a bit curious," said Logan, a former star prep quarterback who played in the NFL for the Cleveland Browns and Denver Broncos before embarking on a successful coaching and broadcasting career. "We'll find out what the allegations are, then I'll stand up and deal with it head-on.
"I've conducted myself for 19 years as a head football coach with integrity and have not deviated from that," he said. "I've never deviated from that."
A source familiar with the report of violations said it stems from an Oct. 21 game against Arapahoe High School in which eighth-graders were on the Mullen sideline during the game.
The practice is barred because it could give schools an unfair advantage in recruiting students. The students were later asked to sit in the stands, the source said.
Clement said last week that Logan was fired because the school wanted its football coach to be a full-time faculty member who can "be engaged in every facet" of the school.
Clement elaborated on that Wednesday, saying that in their final conversation with Logan last week, he and principal Jim Gmelich expressed concern that the school's compliance with state rules suffered because there wasn't a full-time commitment to the job.
"This is not the first time these conversations were had," Clement said.
He said that after Logan made his firing public, Mullen leadership has worked "to get to the bottom of the most obvious violations" and reported them to the CHSAA on Wednesday.
He said there also was evidence of other violations. He said the school leadership will develop a "comprehensive and independent" process to determine other possible violations and also create a "more rigorous protocol" to ensure the infractions are not repeated.
"This will be a difficult process but it is necessary — in fact, there is little doubt it is past due," he said.
Clement did not go into detail about the violations, and both he and Gmelich declined interview requests after the meeting.
Jeff Braun, a defensive coordinator last season at Mullen, said the accusations "are just false. I just think they are coming up with an excuse to try to get rid of a good staff."
Paul Angelico, Colorado High School Activities Association commissioner, said the association hasn't had time to review the material from Mullen.
Under CHSAA rules, Mullen is required to give notice of any infractions and lay out a corrective action plan, Clement said. If CHSAA accepts the school's efforts at self-enforcement, no additional penalties will be imposed, he said. Mullen has not faced any previous sanctions for recruiting violations.
Both public and private schools have occasionally been slapped on the wrist for recruiting violations by CHSAA. In a recent series, The Denver Post discovered that numerous schools, including Valor Christian and Regis Jesuit, have broken CHSAA rules regarding recruiting, most of them minor.
Mullen board chairman Kurt Caulson told the standing-room-only crowd that the board was 100 percent behind Clement's decision to fire Logan.
Gmelich, who took over as Mullen principal this year after a stint at Regis, said "systemic issues" exist at Mullen.
Logan's firing has caused turmoil in the tight-knit Mullen community. Clement acknowledged it was "a difficult hour" for the college-preparatory school, which has a rich tradition of academic and athletic success and of helping subsidize the educations of less-fortunate students.
Speaker after speaker Wednesday complained about the administration's lack of transparency and failure to communicate.
When Clement said being football coach can't be a part-time job, one man in the back yelled, "It can't be? It has been!"
"We absolutely love this place," said Jim Healy, a parent of Mullen graduates. "What we have right now is an absolute lack and vacuum of leadership and no trust at all."
Not everyone was critical, however. Some backed the administration, and one speaker expressed dismay at the "lynch mob mentality" in the room.
Clement, a former quarterback at Mullen, also refuted reports that he was angling to coach at the school.
He said the search for a new coach would begin next week and be "open, inclusive and transparent." He also praised Logan for his hard work, commitment to results and success.
However, he said, "we believe it is time for a new start."
Eric Gorski: 303-954-1971 oregorski@denverpost.com
Read more:Mullen High reveals recruiting violations in football program - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/preps/ci_19771784#ixzz1jvIXqkP0
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Source: The Denver Post online (article linked here)
Posted by
Katie
at
10:24 AM
0
comments
Labels:
emotional pain,
football,
mullen,
racism,
school,
social justice,
sports
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
On Pictures of the Past
Because Jacob just emailed me some OLD pictures from his phone:
Denver Pride 2011 - and I didn't even get sunburned!
us, at some point. I say February 2011. We're adorable.
and because I found this while going through some stuff at Mom's:
My family. 2006? Judging by hair color and completely over-plucked eyebrows, I was probably between the ages of 16-18.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





